YES
Termination Proof
Termination Proof
by ttt2 (version ttt2 1.15)
Input
The rewrite relation of the following TRS is considered.
a(d(x0)) |
→ |
d(b(x0)) |
a(x0) |
→ |
b(b(b(x0))) |
d(x0) |
→ |
x0 |
a(x0) |
→ |
x0 |
b(d(b(x0))) |
→ |
a(d(x0)) |
b(c(x0)) |
→ |
c(d(d(x0))) |
a(c(x0)) |
→ |
b(b(c(d(x0)))) |
Proof
1 Rule Removal
Using the
linear polynomial interpretation over (2 x 2)-matrices with strict dimension 1
over the arctic semiring over the integers
[a(x1)] |
= |
·
x1 +
|
[c(x1)] |
= |
·
x1 +
|
[d(x1)] |
= |
·
x1 +
|
[b(x1)] |
= |
·
x1 +
|
the
rules
a(d(x0)) |
→ |
d(b(x0)) |
a(x0) |
→ |
b(b(b(x0))) |
d(x0) |
→ |
x0 |
a(x0) |
→ |
x0 |
b(d(b(x0))) |
→ |
a(d(x0)) |
b(c(x0)) |
→ |
c(d(d(x0))) |
remain.
1.1 Dependency Pair Transformation
The following set of initial dependency pairs has been identified.
a#(d(x0)) |
→ |
b#(x0) |
a#(d(x0)) |
→ |
d#(b(x0)) |
a#(x0) |
→ |
b#(x0) |
a#(x0) |
→ |
b#(b(x0)) |
a#(x0) |
→ |
b#(b(b(x0))) |
b#(d(b(x0))) |
→ |
d#(x0) |
b#(d(b(x0))) |
→ |
a#(d(x0)) |
b#(c(x0)) |
→ |
d#(x0) |
b#(c(x0)) |
→ |
d#(d(x0)) |
1.1.1 Dependency Graph Processor
The dependency pairs are split into 1
component.