YES Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /home/cern_httpd/provide/research/cycsrs/tpdb/TPDB-d9b80194f163/SRS_Standard/Zantema_04/z109.srs

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a(a(a(x))) → b(b(x))
b(b(b(x))) → c(x)
c(x) → d(d(x))
d(x) → a(a(x))

Q is empty.

(1) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Used ordering:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(a(x1)) = 11 + x1   
POL(b(x1)) = 16 + x1   
POL(c(x1)) = 47 + x1   
POL(d(x1)) = 23 + x1   
With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly:

a(a(a(x))) → b(b(x))
b(b(b(x))) → c(x)
c(x) → d(d(x))
d(x) → a(a(x))


(2) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
R is empty.
Q is empty.

(3) RisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven.

(4) YES