YES Termination Proof

Termination Proof

by ttt2 (version ttt2 1.15)

Input

The rewrite relation of the following TRS is considered.

0(*(x0)) *(1(x0))
1(*(x0)) 0(#(x0))
#(0(x0)) 0(#(x0))
#(1(x0)) 1(#(x0))
#($(x0)) *($(x0))
#(#(x0)) #(x0)
#(*(x0)) *(x0)

Proof

1 Rule Removal

Using the linear polynomial interpretation over the arctic semiring over the integers
[$(x1)] = 4 · x1 + -∞
[0(x1)] = 8 · x1 + -∞
[#(x1)] = 4 · x1 + -∞
[*(x1)] = 4 · x1 + -∞
[1(x1)] = 8 · x1 + -∞
the rules
0(*(x0)) *(1(x0))
1(*(x0)) 0(#(x0))
#(0(x0)) 0(#(x0))
#(1(x0)) 1(#(x0))
#($(x0)) *($(x0))
remain.

1.1 Rule Removal

Using the Knuth Bendix order with w0 = 1 and the following precedence and weight function
prec($) = 4 weight($) = 0
prec(#) = 3 weight(#) = 1
prec(1) = 2 weight(1) = 1
prec(0) = 1 weight(0) = 1
prec(*) = 0 weight(*) = 1
all rules could be removed.

1.1.1 R is empty

There are no rules in the TRS. Hence, it is terminating.