YES Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /home/cern_httpd/provide/research/cycsrs/tpdb/TPDB-d9b80194f163/SRS_Standard/Zantema_04/z065.srs

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

0(*(x)) → *(1(x))
1(*(x)) → 0(#(x))
#(0(x)) → 0(#(x))
#(1(x)) → 1(#(x))
#($(x)) → *($(x))
#(#(x)) → #(x)
#(*(x)) → *(x)

Q is empty.

(1) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Used ordering:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(#(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL($(x1)) = x1   
POL(*(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL(0(x1)) = x1   
POL(1(x1)) = x1   
With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly:

#(#(x)) → #(x)
#(*(x)) → *(x)


(2) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

0(*(x)) → *(1(x))
1(*(x)) → 0(#(x))
#(0(x)) → 0(#(x))
#(1(x)) → 1(#(x))
#($(x)) → *($(x))

Q is empty.

(3) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(4) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

01(*(x)) → 11(x)
11(*(x)) → 01(#(x))
11(*(x)) → #1(x)
#1(0(x)) → 01(#(x))
#1(0(x)) → #1(x)
#1(1(x)) → 11(#(x))
#1(1(x)) → #1(x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

0(*(x)) → *(1(x))
1(*(x)) → 0(#(x))
#(0(x)) → 0(#(x))
#(1(x)) → 1(#(x))
#($(x)) → *($(x))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


11(*(x)) → 01(#(x))
11(*(x)) → #1(x)
#1(0(x)) → 01(#(x))
#1(0(x)) → #1(x)
#1(1(x)) → #1(x)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial Order [NEGPOLO,POLO] with Interpretation:
POL( 01(x1) ) = max{0, x1 - 2}

POL( 11(x1) ) = x1

POL( #(x1) ) = 2x1 + 2

POL( 0(x1) ) = 2x1 + 2

POL( 1(x1) ) = 2x1 + 2

POL( $(x1) ) = 1

POL( *(x1) ) = 2x1 + 2

POL( #1(x1) ) = x1


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:

#(0(x)) → 0(#(x))
#(1(x)) → 1(#(x))
#($(x)) → *($(x))
0(*(x)) → *(1(x))
1(*(x)) → 0(#(x))

(6) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

01(*(x)) → 11(x)
#1(1(x)) → 11(#(x))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

0(*(x)) → *(1(x))
1(*(x)) → 0(#(x))
#(0(x)) → 0(#(x))
#(1(x)) → 1(#(x))
#($(x)) → *($(x))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(7) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 2 less nodes.

(8) TRUE