(0) Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
Begin(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → Wait(Right1(x))
Begin(b(a(a(b(x))))) → Wait(Right2(x))
Begin(a(a(b(x)))) → Wait(Right3(x))
Begin(a(b(x))) → Wait(Right4(x))
Begin(b(x)) → Wait(Right5(x))
Right1(a(End(x))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right2(a(b(End(x)))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right3(a(b(b(End(x))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right4(a(b(b(a(End(x)))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right5(a(b(b(a(a(End(x))))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right1(a(x)) → Aa(Right1(x))
Right2(a(x)) → Aa(Right2(x))
Right3(a(x)) → Aa(Right3(x))
Right4(a(x)) → Aa(Right4(x))
Right5(a(x)) → Aa(Right5(x))
Right1(b(x)) → Ab(Right1(x))
Right2(b(x)) → Ab(Right2(x))
Right3(b(x)) → Ab(Right3(x))
Right4(b(x)) → Ab(Right4(x))
Right5(b(x)) → Ab(Right5(x))
Aa(Left(x)) → Left(a(x))
Ab(Left(x)) → Left(b(x))
Wait(Left(x)) → Begin(x)
a(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → a(a(b(b(a(b(a(x)))))))
Q is empty.
(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.
(2) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
BEGIN(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → WAIT(Right1(x))
BEGIN(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → RIGHT1(x)
BEGIN(b(a(a(b(x))))) → WAIT(Right2(x))
BEGIN(b(a(a(b(x))))) → RIGHT2(x)
BEGIN(a(a(b(x)))) → WAIT(Right3(x))
BEGIN(a(a(b(x)))) → RIGHT3(x)
BEGIN(a(b(x))) → WAIT(Right4(x))
BEGIN(a(b(x))) → RIGHT4(x)
BEGIN(b(x)) → WAIT(Right5(x))
BEGIN(b(x)) → RIGHT5(x)
RIGHT1(a(End(x))) → A(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x))))))))
RIGHT1(a(End(x))) → A(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))
RIGHT1(a(End(x))) → A(b(a(End(x))))
RIGHT2(a(b(End(x)))) → A(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x))))))))
RIGHT2(a(b(End(x)))) → A(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))
RIGHT2(a(b(End(x)))) → A(b(a(End(x))))
RIGHT2(a(b(End(x)))) → A(End(x))
RIGHT3(a(b(b(End(x))))) → A(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x))))))))
RIGHT3(a(b(b(End(x))))) → A(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))
RIGHT3(a(b(b(End(x))))) → A(b(a(End(x))))
RIGHT3(a(b(b(End(x))))) → A(End(x))
RIGHT4(a(b(b(a(End(x)))))) → A(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x))))))))
RIGHT4(a(b(b(a(End(x)))))) → A(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))
RIGHT4(a(b(b(a(End(x)))))) → A(b(a(End(x))))
RIGHT5(a(b(b(a(a(End(x))))))) → A(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x))))))))
RIGHT5(a(b(b(a(a(End(x))))))) → A(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))
RIGHT5(a(b(b(a(a(End(x))))))) → A(b(a(End(x))))
RIGHT1(a(x)) → AA(Right1(x))
RIGHT1(a(x)) → RIGHT1(x)
RIGHT2(a(x)) → AA(Right2(x))
RIGHT2(a(x)) → RIGHT2(x)
RIGHT3(a(x)) → AA(Right3(x))
RIGHT3(a(x)) → RIGHT3(x)
RIGHT4(a(x)) → AA(Right4(x))
RIGHT4(a(x)) → RIGHT4(x)
RIGHT5(a(x)) → AA(Right5(x))
RIGHT5(a(x)) → RIGHT5(x)
RIGHT1(b(x)) → AB(Right1(x))
RIGHT1(b(x)) → RIGHT1(x)
RIGHT2(b(x)) → AB(Right2(x))
RIGHT2(b(x)) → RIGHT2(x)
RIGHT3(b(x)) → AB(Right3(x))
RIGHT3(b(x)) → RIGHT3(x)
RIGHT4(b(x)) → AB(Right4(x))
RIGHT4(b(x)) → RIGHT4(x)
RIGHT5(b(x)) → AB(Right5(x))
RIGHT5(b(x)) → RIGHT5(x)
AA(Left(x)) → A(x)
WAIT(Left(x)) → BEGIN(x)
A(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → A(a(b(b(a(b(a(x)))))))
A(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → A(b(b(a(b(a(x))))))
A(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → A(b(a(x)))
A(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → A(x)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
Begin(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → Wait(Right1(x))
Begin(b(a(a(b(x))))) → Wait(Right2(x))
Begin(a(a(b(x)))) → Wait(Right3(x))
Begin(a(b(x))) → Wait(Right4(x))
Begin(b(x)) → Wait(Right5(x))
Right1(a(End(x))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right2(a(b(End(x)))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right3(a(b(b(End(x))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right4(a(b(b(a(End(x)))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right5(a(b(b(a(a(End(x))))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right1(a(x)) → Aa(Right1(x))
Right2(a(x)) → Aa(Right2(x))
Right3(a(x)) → Aa(Right3(x))
Right4(a(x)) → Aa(Right4(x))
Right5(a(x)) → Aa(Right5(x))
Right1(b(x)) → Ab(Right1(x))
Right2(b(x)) → Ab(Right2(x))
Right3(b(x)) → Ab(Right3(x))
Right4(b(x)) → Ab(Right4(x))
Right5(b(x)) → Ab(Right5(x))
Aa(Left(x)) → Left(a(x))
Ab(Left(x)) → Left(b(x))
Wait(Left(x)) → Begin(x)
a(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → a(a(b(b(a(b(a(x)))))))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 7 SCCs with 35 less nodes.
(4) Complex Obligation (AND)
(5) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
A(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → A(x)
A(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → A(b(b(a(b(a(x))))))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
Begin(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → Wait(Right1(x))
Begin(b(a(a(b(x))))) → Wait(Right2(x))
Begin(a(a(b(x)))) → Wait(Right3(x))
Begin(a(b(x))) → Wait(Right4(x))
Begin(b(x)) → Wait(Right5(x))
Right1(a(End(x))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right2(a(b(End(x)))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right3(a(b(b(End(x))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right4(a(b(b(a(End(x)))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right5(a(b(b(a(a(End(x))))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right1(a(x)) → Aa(Right1(x))
Right2(a(x)) → Aa(Right2(x))
Right3(a(x)) → Aa(Right3(x))
Right4(a(x)) → Aa(Right4(x))
Right5(a(x)) → Aa(Right5(x))
Right1(b(x)) → Ab(Right1(x))
Right2(b(x)) → Ab(Right2(x))
Right3(b(x)) → Ab(Right3(x))
Right4(b(x)) → Ab(Right4(x))
Right5(b(x)) → Ab(Right5(x))
Aa(Left(x)) → Left(a(x))
Ab(Left(x)) → Left(b(x))
Wait(Left(x)) → Begin(x)
a(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → a(a(b(b(a(b(a(x)))))))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(6) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.
(7) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
A(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → A(x)
A(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → A(b(b(a(b(a(x))))))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
a(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → a(a(b(b(a(b(a(x)))))))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(8) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].
The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
A(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → A(x)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:
POL(A(x1)) = x1
POL(a(x1)) = x1
POL(b(x1)) = 1 + x1
The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:
a(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → a(a(b(b(a(b(a(x)))))))
(9) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
A(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → A(b(b(a(b(a(x))))))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
a(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → a(a(b(b(a(b(a(x)))))))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(10) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].
The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
A(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → A(b(b(a(b(a(x))))))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Matrix interpretation [MATRO] with arctic natural numbers [ARCTIC]:
POL(b(x1)) = | | + | / | 0A | -I | -I | \ |
| | -I | -I | 1A | | |
\ | -I | -I | -I | / |
| · | x1 |
POL(a(x1)) = | | + | / | 0A | -I | 0A | \ |
| | -I | 0A | -I | | |
\ | 1A | 0A | 0A | / |
| · | x1 |
The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:
a(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → a(a(b(b(a(b(a(x)))))))
(11) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
a(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → a(a(b(b(a(b(a(x)))))))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(12) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.
(13) YES
(14) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
RIGHT5(b(x)) → RIGHT5(x)
RIGHT5(a(x)) → RIGHT5(x)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
Begin(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → Wait(Right1(x))
Begin(b(a(a(b(x))))) → Wait(Right2(x))
Begin(a(a(b(x)))) → Wait(Right3(x))
Begin(a(b(x))) → Wait(Right4(x))
Begin(b(x)) → Wait(Right5(x))
Right1(a(End(x))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right2(a(b(End(x)))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right3(a(b(b(End(x))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right4(a(b(b(a(End(x)))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right5(a(b(b(a(a(End(x))))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right1(a(x)) → Aa(Right1(x))
Right2(a(x)) → Aa(Right2(x))
Right3(a(x)) → Aa(Right3(x))
Right4(a(x)) → Aa(Right4(x))
Right5(a(x)) → Aa(Right5(x))
Right1(b(x)) → Ab(Right1(x))
Right2(b(x)) → Ab(Right2(x))
Right3(b(x)) → Ab(Right3(x))
Right4(b(x)) → Ab(Right4(x))
Right5(b(x)) → Ab(Right5(x))
Aa(Left(x)) → Left(a(x))
Ab(Left(x)) → Left(b(x))
Wait(Left(x)) → Begin(x)
a(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → a(a(b(b(a(b(a(x)))))))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(15) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.
(16) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
RIGHT5(b(x)) → RIGHT5(x)
RIGHT5(a(x)) → RIGHT5(x)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(17) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.
From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- RIGHT5(b(x)) → RIGHT5(x)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
- RIGHT5(a(x)) → RIGHT5(x)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
(18) YES
(19) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
RIGHT4(b(x)) → RIGHT4(x)
RIGHT4(a(x)) → RIGHT4(x)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
Begin(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → Wait(Right1(x))
Begin(b(a(a(b(x))))) → Wait(Right2(x))
Begin(a(a(b(x)))) → Wait(Right3(x))
Begin(a(b(x))) → Wait(Right4(x))
Begin(b(x)) → Wait(Right5(x))
Right1(a(End(x))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right2(a(b(End(x)))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right3(a(b(b(End(x))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right4(a(b(b(a(End(x)))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right5(a(b(b(a(a(End(x))))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right1(a(x)) → Aa(Right1(x))
Right2(a(x)) → Aa(Right2(x))
Right3(a(x)) → Aa(Right3(x))
Right4(a(x)) → Aa(Right4(x))
Right5(a(x)) → Aa(Right5(x))
Right1(b(x)) → Ab(Right1(x))
Right2(b(x)) → Ab(Right2(x))
Right3(b(x)) → Ab(Right3(x))
Right4(b(x)) → Ab(Right4(x))
Right5(b(x)) → Ab(Right5(x))
Aa(Left(x)) → Left(a(x))
Ab(Left(x)) → Left(b(x))
Wait(Left(x)) → Begin(x)
a(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → a(a(b(b(a(b(a(x)))))))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(20) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.
(21) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
RIGHT4(b(x)) → RIGHT4(x)
RIGHT4(a(x)) → RIGHT4(x)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(22) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.
From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- RIGHT4(b(x)) → RIGHT4(x)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
- RIGHT4(a(x)) → RIGHT4(x)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
(23) YES
(24) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
RIGHT3(b(x)) → RIGHT3(x)
RIGHT3(a(x)) → RIGHT3(x)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
Begin(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → Wait(Right1(x))
Begin(b(a(a(b(x))))) → Wait(Right2(x))
Begin(a(a(b(x)))) → Wait(Right3(x))
Begin(a(b(x))) → Wait(Right4(x))
Begin(b(x)) → Wait(Right5(x))
Right1(a(End(x))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right2(a(b(End(x)))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right3(a(b(b(End(x))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right4(a(b(b(a(End(x)))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right5(a(b(b(a(a(End(x))))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right1(a(x)) → Aa(Right1(x))
Right2(a(x)) → Aa(Right2(x))
Right3(a(x)) → Aa(Right3(x))
Right4(a(x)) → Aa(Right4(x))
Right5(a(x)) → Aa(Right5(x))
Right1(b(x)) → Ab(Right1(x))
Right2(b(x)) → Ab(Right2(x))
Right3(b(x)) → Ab(Right3(x))
Right4(b(x)) → Ab(Right4(x))
Right5(b(x)) → Ab(Right5(x))
Aa(Left(x)) → Left(a(x))
Ab(Left(x)) → Left(b(x))
Wait(Left(x)) → Begin(x)
a(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → a(a(b(b(a(b(a(x)))))))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(25) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.
(26) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
RIGHT3(b(x)) → RIGHT3(x)
RIGHT3(a(x)) → RIGHT3(x)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(27) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.
From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- RIGHT3(b(x)) → RIGHT3(x)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
- RIGHT3(a(x)) → RIGHT3(x)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
(28) YES
(29) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
RIGHT2(b(x)) → RIGHT2(x)
RIGHT2(a(x)) → RIGHT2(x)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
Begin(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → Wait(Right1(x))
Begin(b(a(a(b(x))))) → Wait(Right2(x))
Begin(a(a(b(x)))) → Wait(Right3(x))
Begin(a(b(x))) → Wait(Right4(x))
Begin(b(x)) → Wait(Right5(x))
Right1(a(End(x))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right2(a(b(End(x)))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right3(a(b(b(End(x))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right4(a(b(b(a(End(x)))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right5(a(b(b(a(a(End(x))))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right1(a(x)) → Aa(Right1(x))
Right2(a(x)) → Aa(Right2(x))
Right3(a(x)) → Aa(Right3(x))
Right4(a(x)) → Aa(Right4(x))
Right5(a(x)) → Aa(Right5(x))
Right1(b(x)) → Ab(Right1(x))
Right2(b(x)) → Ab(Right2(x))
Right3(b(x)) → Ab(Right3(x))
Right4(b(x)) → Ab(Right4(x))
Right5(b(x)) → Ab(Right5(x))
Aa(Left(x)) → Left(a(x))
Ab(Left(x)) → Left(b(x))
Wait(Left(x)) → Begin(x)
a(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → a(a(b(b(a(b(a(x)))))))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(30) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.
(31) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
RIGHT2(b(x)) → RIGHT2(x)
RIGHT2(a(x)) → RIGHT2(x)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(32) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.
From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- RIGHT2(b(x)) → RIGHT2(x)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
- RIGHT2(a(x)) → RIGHT2(x)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
(33) YES
(34) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
RIGHT1(b(x)) → RIGHT1(x)
RIGHT1(a(x)) → RIGHT1(x)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
Begin(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → Wait(Right1(x))
Begin(b(a(a(b(x))))) → Wait(Right2(x))
Begin(a(a(b(x)))) → Wait(Right3(x))
Begin(a(b(x))) → Wait(Right4(x))
Begin(b(x)) → Wait(Right5(x))
Right1(a(End(x))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right2(a(b(End(x)))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right3(a(b(b(End(x))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right4(a(b(b(a(End(x)))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right5(a(b(b(a(a(End(x))))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right1(a(x)) → Aa(Right1(x))
Right2(a(x)) → Aa(Right2(x))
Right3(a(x)) → Aa(Right3(x))
Right4(a(x)) → Aa(Right4(x))
Right5(a(x)) → Aa(Right5(x))
Right1(b(x)) → Ab(Right1(x))
Right2(b(x)) → Ab(Right2(x))
Right3(b(x)) → Ab(Right3(x))
Right4(b(x)) → Ab(Right4(x))
Right5(b(x)) → Ab(Right5(x))
Aa(Left(x)) → Left(a(x))
Ab(Left(x)) → Left(b(x))
Wait(Left(x)) → Begin(x)
a(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → a(a(b(b(a(b(a(x)))))))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(35) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.
(36) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
RIGHT1(b(x)) → RIGHT1(x)
RIGHT1(a(x)) → RIGHT1(x)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(37) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.
From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- RIGHT1(b(x)) → RIGHT1(x)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
- RIGHT1(a(x)) → RIGHT1(x)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
(38) YES
(39) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
WAIT(Left(x)) → BEGIN(x)
BEGIN(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → WAIT(Right1(x))
BEGIN(b(a(a(b(x))))) → WAIT(Right2(x))
BEGIN(a(a(b(x)))) → WAIT(Right3(x))
BEGIN(a(b(x))) → WAIT(Right4(x))
BEGIN(b(x)) → WAIT(Right5(x))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
Begin(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → Wait(Right1(x))
Begin(b(a(a(b(x))))) → Wait(Right2(x))
Begin(a(a(b(x)))) → Wait(Right3(x))
Begin(a(b(x))) → Wait(Right4(x))
Begin(b(x)) → Wait(Right5(x))
Right1(a(End(x))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right2(a(b(End(x)))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right3(a(b(b(End(x))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right4(a(b(b(a(End(x)))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right5(a(b(b(a(a(End(x))))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right1(a(x)) → Aa(Right1(x))
Right2(a(x)) → Aa(Right2(x))
Right3(a(x)) → Aa(Right3(x))
Right4(a(x)) → Aa(Right4(x))
Right5(a(x)) → Aa(Right5(x))
Right1(b(x)) → Ab(Right1(x))
Right2(b(x)) → Ab(Right2(x))
Right3(b(x)) → Ab(Right3(x))
Right4(b(x)) → Ab(Right4(x))
Right5(b(x)) → Ab(Right5(x))
Aa(Left(x)) → Left(a(x))
Ab(Left(x)) → Left(b(x))
Wait(Left(x)) → Begin(x)
a(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → a(a(b(b(a(b(a(x)))))))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(40) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.
(41) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
WAIT(Left(x)) → BEGIN(x)
BEGIN(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → WAIT(Right1(x))
BEGIN(b(a(a(b(x))))) → WAIT(Right2(x))
BEGIN(a(a(b(x)))) → WAIT(Right3(x))
BEGIN(a(b(x))) → WAIT(Right4(x))
BEGIN(b(x)) → WAIT(Right5(x))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
Right5(a(b(b(a(a(End(x))))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right5(a(x)) → Aa(Right5(x))
Right5(b(x)) → Ab(Right5(x))
Ab(Left(x)) → Left(b(x))
Aa(Left(x)) → Left(a(x))
a(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → a(a(b(b(a(b(a(x)))))))
Right4(a(b(b(a(End(x)))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right4(a(x)) → Aa(Right4(x))
Right4(b(x)) → Ab(Right4(x))
Right3(a(b(b(End(x))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right3(a(x)) → Aa(Right3(x))
Right3(b(x)) → Ab(Right3(x))
Right2(a(b(End(x)))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right2(a(x)) → Aa(Right2(x))
Right2(b(x)) → Ab(Right2(x))
Right1(a(End(x))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right1(a(x)) → Aa(Right1(x))
Right1(b(x)) → Ab(Right1(x))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(42) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].
The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
BEGIN(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → WAIT(Right1(x))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Matrix interpretation [MATRO] with arctic natural numbers [ARCTIC]:
POL(Left(x1)) = | | + | / | -I | -I | 0A | \ |
| | -I | 0A | -I | | |
\ | 0A | -I | -I | / |
| · | x1 |
POL(BEGIN(x1)) = | 0A | + | | · | x1 |
POL(b(x1)) = | | + | / | 0A | -I | 0A | \ |
| | 0A | -I | 0A | | |
\ | 1A | 0A | -I | / |
| · | x1 |
POL(a(x1)) = | | + | / | 0A | 0A | -I | \ |
| | 0A | -I | 0A | | |
\ | -I | 0A | -I | / |
| · | x1 |
POL(Right1(x1)) = | | + | / | 1A | 0A | 1A | \ |
| | -I | 1A | 0A | | |
\ | 1A | 0A | 0A | / |
| · | x1 |
POL(Right2(x1)) = | | + | / | 0A | -I | 0A | \ |
| | 0A | 0A | -I | | |
\ | 0A | -I | -I | / |
| · | x1 |
POL(Right3(x1)) = | | + | / | 1A | 0A | 1A | \ |
| | 0A | 1A | 0A | | |
\ | 1A | 0A | 0A | / |
| · | x1 |
POL(Right4(x1)) = | | + | / | 0A | -I | 0A | \ |
| | 0A | 0A | -I | | |
\ | 0A | -I | -I | / |
| · | x1 |
POL(Right5(x1)) = | | + | / | 0A | -I | 0A | \ |
| | 0A | 0A | -I | | |
\ | 0A | -I | -I | / |
| · | x1 |
POL(End(x1)) = | | + | / | 0A | -I | -I | \ |
| | -I | -I | -I | | |
\ | 1A | -I | 0A | / |
| · | x1 |
POL(Aa(x1)) = | | + | / | -I | 0A | -I | \ |
| | 0A | -I | 0A | | |
\ | -I | 0A | 0A | / |
| · | x1 |
POL(Ab(x1)) = | | + | / | -I | 0A | 1A | \ |
| | 0A | -I | 0A | | |
\ | 0A | -I | 0A | / |
| · | x1 |
The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:
Right1(a(End(x))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right1(a(x)) → Aa(Right1(x))
Right1(b(x)) → Ab(Right1(x))
Right2(a(b(End(x)))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right2(a(x)) → Aa(Right2(x))
Right2(b(x)) → Ab(Right2(x))
Right3(a(b(b(End(x))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right3(a(x)) → Aa(Right3(x))
Right3(b(x)) → Ab(Right3(x))
Right4(a(b(b(a(End(x)))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right4(a(x)) → Aa(Right4(x))
Right4(b(x)) → Ab(Right4(x))
Right5(a(b(b(a(a(End(x))))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right5(a(x)) → Aa(Right5(x))
Right5(b(x)) → Ab(Right5(x))
Ab(Left(x)) → Left(b(x))
Aa(Left(x)) → Left(a(x))
a(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → a(a(b(b(a(b(a(x)))))))
(43) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
WAIT(Left(x)) → BEGIN(x)
BEGIN(b(a(a(b(x))))) → WAIT(Right2(x))
BEGIN(a(a(b(x)))) → WAIT(Right3(x))
BEGIN(a(b(x))) → WAIT(Right4(x))
BEGIN(b(x)) → WAIT(Right5(x))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
Right5(a(b(b(a(a(End(x))))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right5(a(x)) → Aa(Right5(x))
Right5(b(x)) → Ab(Right5(x))
Ab(Left(x)) → Left(b(x))
Aa(Left(x)) → Left(a(x))
a(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → a(a(b(b(a(b(a(x)))))))
Right4(a(b(b(a(End(x)))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right4(a(x)) → Aa(Right4(x))
Right4(b(x)) → Ab(Right4(x))
Right3(a(b(b(End(x))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right3(a(x)) → Aa(Right3(x))
Right3(b(x)) → Ab(Right3(x))
Right2(a(b(End(x)))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right2(a(x)) → Aa(Right2(x))
Right2(b(x)) → Ab(Right2(x))
Right1(a(End(x))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right1(a(x)) → Aa(Right1(x))
Right1(b(x)) → Ab(Right1(x))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(44) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.
(45) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
WAIT(Left(x)) → BEGIN(x)
BEGIN(b(a(a(b(x))))) → WAIT(Right2(x))
BEGIN(a(a(b(x)))) → WAIT(Right3(x))
BEGIN(a(b(x))) → WAIT(Right4(x))
BEGIN(b(x)) → WAIT(Right5(x))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
Right5(a(b(b(a(a(End(x))))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right5(a(x)) → Aa(Right5(x))
Right5(b(x)) → Ab(Right5(x))
Ab(Left(x)) → Left(b(x))
Aa(Left(x)) → Left(a(x))
a(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → a(a(b(b(a(b(a(x)))))))
Right4(a(b(b(a(End(x)))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right4(a(x)) → Aa(Right4(x))
Right4(b(x)) → Ab(Right4(x))
Right3(a(b(b(End(x))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right3(a(x)) → Aa(Right3(x))
Right3(b(x)) → Ab(Right3(x))
Right2(a(b(End(x)))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right2(a(x)) → Aa(Right2(x))
Right2(b(x)) → Ab(Right2(x))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(46) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].
The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
BEGIN(b(a(a(b(x))))) → WAIT(Right2(x))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Matrix interpretation [MATRO] with arctic natural numbers [ARCTIC]:
POL(Left(x1)) = | | + | / | -I | 0A | 0A | \ |
| | 0A | 0A | -I | | |
\ | 1A | 1A | 1A | / |
| · | x1 |
POL(BEGIN(x1)) = | 0A | + | | · | x1 |
POL(b(x1)) = | | + | / | 0A | 0A | 0A | \ |
| | 0A | 0A | 0A | | |
\ | -I | 0A | 0A | / |
| · | x1 |
POL(a(x1)) = | | + | / | -I | 0A | -I | \ |
| | -I | 0A | 0A | | |
\ | -I | 0A | 0A | / |
| · | x1 |
POL(Right2(x1)) = | | + | / | 0A | 0A | 0A | \ |
| | -I | -I | 0A | | |
\ | -I | -I | 0A | / |
| · | x1 |
POL(Right3(x1)) = | | + | / | 0A | 0A | 1A | \ |
| | 0A | 0A | 0A | | |
\ | -I | 0A | 0A | / |
| · | x1 |
POL(Right4(x1)) = | | + | / | 1A | 0A | 1A | \ |
| | 0A | 0A | 1A | | |
\ | -I | 0A | 1A | / |
| · | x1 |
POL(Right5(x1)) = | | + | / | 0A | 0A | 1A | \ |
| | 1A | 0A | 0A | | |
\ | -I | 1A | 0A | / |
| · | x1 |
POL(End(x1)) = | | + | / | 1A | 0A | 0A | \ |
| | 0A | -I | -I | | |
\ | 0A | -I | -I | / |
| · | x1 |
POL(Aa(x1)) = | | + | / | -I | -I | 0A | \ |
| | -I | -I | 0A | | |
\ | -I | -I | 0A | / |
| · | x1 |
POL(Ab(x1)) = | | + | / | 0A | -I | 0A | \ |
| | -I | 0A | 0A | | |
\ | -I | 0A | 0A | / |
| · | x1 |
The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:
Right2(a(b(End(x)))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right2(a(x)) → Aa(Right2(x))
Right2(b(x)) → Ab(Right2(x))
Right3(a(b(b(End(x))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right3(a(x)) → Aa(Right3(x))
Right3(b(x)) → Ab(Right3(x))
Right4(a(b(b(a(End(x)))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right4(a(x)) → Aa(Right4(x))
Right4(b(x)) → Ab(Right4(x))
Right5(a(b(b(a(a(End(x))))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right5(a(x)) → Aa(Right5(x))
Right5(b(x)) → Ab(Right5(x))
Ab(Left(x)) → Left(b(x))
Aa(Left(x)) → Left(a(x))
a(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → a(a(b(b(a(b(a(x)))))))
(47) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
WAIT(Left(x)) → BEGIN(x)
BEGIN(a(a(b(x)))) → WAIT(Right3(x))
BEGIN(a(b(x))) → WAIT(Right4(x))
BEGIN(b(x)) → WAIT(Right5(x))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
Right5(a(b(b(a(a(End(x))))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right5(a(x)) → Aa(Right5(x))
Right5(b(x)) → Ab(Right5(x))
Ab(Left(x)) → Left(b(x))
Aa(Left(x)) → Left(a(x))
a(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → a(a(b(b(a(b(a(x)))))))
Right4(a(b(b(a(End(x)))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right4(a(x)) → Aa(Right4(x))
Right4(b(x)) → Ab(Right4(x))
Right3(a(b(b(End(x))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right3(a(x)) → Aa(Right3(x))
Right3(b(x)) → Ab(Right3(x))
Right2(a(b(End(x)))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right2(a(x)) → Aa(Right2(x))
Right2(b(x)) → Ab(Right2(x))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(48) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.
(49) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
WAIT(Left(x)) → BEGIN(x)
BEGIN(a(a(b(x)))) → WAIT(Right3(x))
BEGIN(a(b(x))) → WAIT(Right4(x))
BEGIN(b(x)) → WAIT(Right5(x))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
Right5(a(b(b(a(a(End(x))))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right5(a(x)) → Aa(Right5(x))
Right5(b(x)) → Ab(Right5(x))
Ab(Left(x)) → Left(b(x))
Aa(Left(x)) → Left(a(x))
a(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → a(a(b(b(a(b(a(x)))))))
Right4(a(b(b(a(End(x)))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right4(a(x)) → Aa(Right4(x))
Right4(b(x)) → Ab(Right4(x))
Right3(a(b(b(End(x))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right3(a(x)) → Aa(Right3(x))
Right3(b(x)) → Ab(Right3(x))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(50) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].
The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
WAIT(Left(x)) → BEGIN(x)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Matrix interpretation [MATRO] with arctic natural numbers [ARCTIC]:
POL(Left(x1)) = | | + | / | 0A | 1A | -I | \ |
| | 0A | 1A | -I | | |
\ | 1A | 0A | 1A | / |
| · | x1 |
POL(BEGIN(x1)) = | -I | + | | · | x1 |
POL(a(x1)) = | | + | / | -I | -I | 0A | \ |
| | -I | 0A | 0A | | |
\ | -I | -I | 0A | / |
| · | x1 |
POL(b(x1)) = | | + | / | 0A | 0A | 0A | \ |
| | -I | -I | 0A | | |
\ | 0A | -I | 0A | / |
| · | x1 |
POL(Right3(x1)) = | | + | / | 0A | -I | 0A | \ |
| | -I | -I | 0A | | |
\ | -I | -I | 0A | / |
| · | x1 |
POL(Right4(x1)) = | | + | / | 0A | -I | 0A | \ |
| | -I | -I | 0A | | |
\ | -I | -I | 0A | / |
| · | x1 |
POL(Right5(x1)) = | | + | / | 0A | 0A | -I | \ |
| | -I | -I | 0A | | |
\ | -I | -I | 0A | / |
| · | x1 |
POL(End(x1)) = | | + | / | -I | 0A | 0A | \ |
| | 1A | -I | 1A | | |
\ | 0A | -I | 0A | / |
| · | x1 |
POL(Aa(x1)) = | | + | / | -I | 0A | 0A | \ |
| | -I | 0A | 0A | | |
\ | -I | 0A | 0A | / |
| · | x1 |
POL(Ab(x1)) = | | + | / | 0A | 0A | 0A | \ |
| | -I | 0A | 0A | | |
\ | -I | 0A | 0A | / |
| · | x1 |
The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:
Right3(a(b(b(End(x))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right3(a(x)) → Aa(Right3(x))
Right3(b(x)) → Ab(Right3(x))
Right4(a(b(b(a(End(x)))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right4(a(x)) → Aa(Right4(x))
Right4(b(x)) → Ab(Right4(x))
Right5(a(b(b(a(a(End(x))))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right5(a(x)) → Aa(Right5(x))
Right5(b(x)) → Ab(Right5(x))
Ab(Left(x)) → Left(b(x))
Aa(Left(x)) → Left(a(x))
a(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → a(a(b(b(a(b(a(x)))))))
(51) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
BEGIN(a(a(b(x)))) → WAIT(Right3(x))
BEGIN(a(b(x))) → WAIT(Right4(x))
BEGIN(b(x)) → WAIT(Right5(x))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
Right5(a(b(b(a(a(End(x))))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right5(a(x)) → Aa(Right5(x))
Right5(b(x)) → Ab(Right5(x))
Ab(Left(x)) → Left(b(x))
Aa(Left(x)) → Left(a(x))
a(b(b(a(a(b(x)))))) → a(a(b(b(a(b(a(x)))))))
Right4(a(b(b(a(End(x)))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right4(a(x)) → Aa(Right4(x))
Right4(b(x)) → Ab(Right4(x))
Right3(a(b(b(End(x))))) → Left(a(a(b(b(a(b(a(End(x)))))))))
Right3(a(x)) → Aa(Right3(x))
Right3(b(x)) → Ab(Right3(x))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(52) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 3 less nodes.
(53) TRUE