YES Termination Proof

Termination Proof

by ttt2 (version ttt2 1.15)

Input

The rewrite relation of the following TRS is considered.

a(a(x0))	→	b(x0)
b(c(x0))	→	a(x0)
c(b(x0))	→	b(c(c(a(x0))))

Proof

1 Dependency Pair Transformation

The following set of initial dependency pairs has been identified.

a^#(a(x0))	→	b^#(x0)
b^#(c(x0))	→	a^#(x0)
c^#(b(x0))	→	a^#(x0)
c^#(b(x0))	→	c^#(a(x0))
c^#(b(x0))	→	c^#(c(a(x0)))
c^#(b(x0))	→	b^#(c(c(a(x0))))

1.1 Dependency Graph Processor

The dependency pairs are split into 1 component.

The 1^st component contains the pairs

c^#(b(x0))	→	c^#(c(a(x0)))
c^#(b(x0))	→	c^#(a(x0))

1.1.1 Reduction Pair Processor with Usable Rules

Using the linear polynomial interpretation over (3 x 3)-matrices with strict dimension 1 over the arctic semiring over the integers

[b(x₁)]

0	0	0
1	0	0
0	1	0

· x₁ +

-∞	-∞	-∞
0	-∞	-∞
1	-∞	-∞

[c^#(x₁)]

-∞	0	0
-∞	-∞	-∞
-∞	-∞	-∞

· x₁ +

0	-∞	-∞
-∞	-∞	-∞
-∞	-∞	-∞

[a(x₁)]

-∞	0	-∞
0	1	0
-∞	0	-∞

· x₁ +

0	-∞	-∞
1	-∞	-∞
0	-∞	-∞

[c(x₁)]

-∞	0	0
-∞	-∞	0
0	-∞	0

· x₁ +

0	-∞	-∞
0	-∞	-∞
0	-∞	-∞

together with the usable rules

a(a(x0))	→	b(x0)
b(c(x0))	→	a(x0)
c(b(x0))	→	b(c(c(a(x0))))

(w.r.t. the implicit argument filter of the reduction pair), the pair

c^#(b(x0))

→

c^#(a(x0))

remains.

1.1.1.1 Reduction Pair Processor with Usable Rules

Using the linear polynomial interpretation over (3 x 3)-matrices with strict dimension 1 over the arctic semiring over the integers

[b(x₁)]

1	1	-∞
0	1	-∞
1	0	-∞

· x₁ +

1	-∞	-∞
-∞	-∞	-∞
0	-∞	-∞

[c^#(x₁)]

1	-∞	0
-∞	-∞	-∞
-∞	-∞	-∞

· x₁ +

1	-∞	-∞
-∞	-∞	-∞
-∞	-∞	-∞

[a(x₁)]

0	0	-∞
1	1	0
1	1	-∞

· x₁ +

-∞	-∞	-∞
1	-∞	-∞
0	-∞	-∞

[c(x₁)]

1	0	1
1	0	0
0	0	1

· x₁ +

0	-∞	-∞
0	-∞	-∞
1	-∞	-∞

together with the usable rules

a(a(x0))	→	b(x0)
b(c(x0))	→	a(x0)

(w.r.t. the implicit argument filter of the reduction pair), all pairs could be removed.

1.1.1.1.1 P is empty

There are no pairs anymore.