NO Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /home/cern_httpd/provide/research/cycsrs/tpdb/TPDB-d9b80194f163/SRS_Standard/Waldmann_07_size12/size-12-alpha-3-num-353.srs-torpacyc2out-split.srs

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

Begin(b(x)) → Wait(Right1(x))
Begin(b(x)) → Wait(Right2(x))
Right1(a(End(x))) → Left(b(b(a(c(c(a(End(x))))))))
Right2(c(End(x))) → Left(End(x))
Right1(a(x)) → Aa(Right1(x))
Right2(a(x)) → Aa(Right2(x))
Right1(b(x)) → Ab(Right1(x))
Right2(b(x)) → Ab(Right2(x))
Right1(c(x)) → Ac(Right1(x))
Right2(c(x)) → Ac(Right2(x))
Aa(Left(x)) → Left(a(x))
Ab(Left(x)) → Left(b(x))
Ac(Left(x)) → Left(c(x))
Wait(Left(x)) → Begin(x)
a(x) → b(x)
a(b(x)) → b(b(a(c(c(a(x))))))
c(b(x)) → x

Q is empty.

(1) NonTerminationProof (COMPLETE transformation)

We used the non-termination processor [OPPELT08] to show that the SRS problem is infinite.

Found the self-embedding DerivationStructure:
Wait Left b c c a EndWait Left b c c a End

Wait Left b c c a EndWait Left b c c a End
by OverlapClosure OC 3
Wait Left b c c a EndWait Left a c c a End
by OverlapClosure OC 2
Wait Left bWait Right1
by OverlapClosure OC 2
Wait LeftBegin
by original rule (OC 1)
Begin bWait Right1
by original rule (OC 1)
Right1 c c a EndLeft a c c a End
by OverlapClosure OC 3
Right1 c c a EndAc Left b a c c a End
by OverlapClosure OC 3
Right1 c c a EndAc Left c b b a c c a End
by OverlapClosure OC 2
Right1 cAc Right1
by original rule (OC 1)
Right1 c a EndLeft c b b a c c a End
by OverlapClosure OC 3
Right1 c a EndAc Left b b a c c a End
by OverlapClosure OC 2
Right1 cAc Right1
by original rule (OC 1)
Right1 a EndLeft b b a c c a End
by original rule (OC 1)
Ac LeftLeft c
by original rule (OC 1)
c b
by original rule (OC 1)
Ac Left bLeft
by OverlapClosure OC 2
Ac LeftLeft c
by original rule (OC 1)
c b
by original rule (OC 1)
ab
by original rule (OC 1)

(2) NO