YES Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /home/cern_httpd/provide/research/cycsrs/tpdb/TPDB-d9b80194f163/SRS_Standard/Waldmann_07_size12/size-12-alpha-2-num-8.srs

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a(a(a(x))) → b(x)
a(b(b(x))) → b(a(a(b(a(x)))))

Q is empty.

(1) QTRS Reverse (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We applied the QTRS Reverse Processor [REVERSE].

(2) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a(a(a(x))) → b(x)
b(b(a(x))) → a(b(a(a(b(x)))))

Q is empty.

(3) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(4) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

A(a(a(x))) → B(x)
B(b(a(x))) → A(b(a(a(b(x)))))
B(b(a(x))) → B(a(a(b(x))))
B(b(a(x))) → A(a(b(x)))
B(b(a(x))) → A(b(x))
B(b(a(x))) → B(x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a(a(a(x))) → b(x)
b(b(a(x))) → a(b(a(a(b(x)))))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


B(b(a(x))) → A(b(a(a(b(x)))))
B(b(a(x))) → B(a(a(b(x))))
B(b(a(x))) → A(a(b(x)))
B(b(a(x))) → A(b(x))
B(b(a(x))) → B(x)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Matrix interpretation [MATRO] with arctic natural numbers [ARCTIC]:

POL(A(x1)) = 0A +
[0A,-I,-I]
·x1

POL(a(x1)) =
/0A\
|-I|
\1A/
+
/1A-I0A\
|0A-I-I|
\0A1A-I/
·x1

POL(B(x1)) = 1A +
[-I,0A,-I]
·x1

POL(b(x1)) =
/0A\
|0A|
\-I/
+
/-I0A-I\
|-I0A1A|
\-I1A-I/
·x1

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:

b(b(a(x))) → a(b(a(a(b(x)))))
a(a(a(x))) → b(x)

(6) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

A(a(a(x))) → B(x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a(a(a(x))) → b(x)
b(b(a(x))) → a(b(a(a(b(x)))))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(7) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node.

(8) TRUE