YES Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /home/cern_httpd/provide/research/cycsrs/tpdb/TPDB-d9b80194f163/SRS_Standard/Waldmann_06_SRS/sym-4.srs

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

b(b(x)) → c(c(c(c(x))))
c(x) → x
b(c(b(x))) → b(b(b(x)))

Q is empty.

(1) FlatCCProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We used flat context closure [ROOTLAB] As Q is empty the flat context closure was sound AND complete.

(2) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

b(c(b(x))) → b(b(b(x)))
b(b(b(x))) → b(c(c(c(c(x)))))
c(b(b(x))) → c(c(c(c(c(x)))))
b(c(x)) → b(x)
c(c(x)) → c(x)

Q is empty.

(3) RootLabelingProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We used plain root labeling [ROOTLAB] with the following heuristic: LabelAll: All function symbols get labeled
As Q is empty the root labeling was sound AND complete.

(4) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x))) → b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x)))
b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x))) → b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x)))
b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x))) → b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x)))))
b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x))) → b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x)))))
c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x))) → c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x)))))
c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x))) → c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x)))))
b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x)) → b_{b_1}(x)
b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x)) → b_{c_1}(x)
c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x)) → c_{b_1}(x)
c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x)) → c_{c_1}(x)

Q is empty.

(5) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Used ordering:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(b_{b_1}(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL(b_{c_1}(x1)) = 2 + x1   
POL(c_{b_1}(x1)) = x1   
POL(c_{c_1}(x1)) = x1   
With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly:

b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x))) → b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x)))))
b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x))) → b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x)))))
c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x))) → c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x)))))
c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x))) → c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x)))))
b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x)) → b_{b_1}(x)


(6) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x))) → b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x)))
b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x))) → b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x)))
b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x)) → b_{c_1}(x)
c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x)) → c_{b_1}(x)
c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x)) → c_{c_1}(x)

Q is empty.

(7) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Used ordering:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(b_{b_1}(x1)) = x1   
POL(b_{c_1}(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL(c_{b_1}(x1)) = x1   
POL(c_{c_1}(x1)) = x1   
With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly:

b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x))) → b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x)))
b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x))) → b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x)))


(8) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x)) → b_{c_1}(x)
c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x)) → c_{b_1}(x)
c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x)) → c_{c_1}(x)

Q is empty.

(9) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Used ordering:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(b_{c_1}(x1)) = x1   
POL(c_{b_1}(x1)) = x1   
POL(c_{c_1}(x1)) = 1 + x1   
With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly:

b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x)) → b_{c_1}(x)
c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x)) → c_{b_1}(x)
c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x)) → c_{c_1}(x)


(10) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
R is empty.
Q is empty.

(11) RisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven.

(12) YES