YES Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /home/cern_httpd/provide/research/cycsrs/tpdb/TPDB-d9b80194f163/SRS_Standard/Trafo_06/dup16.srs

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a(a(a(a(x)))) → b(b(b(b(b(b(x))))))
b(b(b(b(x)))) → c(c(c(c(c(c(x))))))
c(c(c(c(x)))) → d(d(d(d(d(d(x))))))
b(b(x)) → d(d(d(d(x))))
c(c(d(d(d(d(x)))))) → a(a(x))

Q is empty.

(1) QTRS Reverse (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We applied the QTRS Reverse Processor [REVERSE].

(2) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a(a(a(a(x)))) → b(b(b(b(b(b(x))))))
b(b(b(b(x)))) → c(c(c(c(c(c(x))))))
c(c(c(c(x)))) → d(d(d(d(d(d(x))))))
b(b(x)) → d(d(d(d(x))))
d(d(d(d(c(c(x)))))) → a(a(x))

Q is empty.

(3) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Used ordering:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(a(x1)) = 134 + x1   
POL(b(x1)) = 89 + x1   
POL(c(x1)) = 59 + x1   
POL(d(x1)) = 39 + x1   
With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly:

a(a(a(a(x)))) → b(b(b(b(b(b(x))))))
b(b(b(b(x)))) → c(c(c(c(c(c(x))))))
c(c(c(c(x)))) → d(d(d(d(d(d(x))))))
b(b(x)) → d(d(d(d(x))))
d(d(d(d(c(c(x)))))) → a(a(x))


(4) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
R is empty.
Q is empty.

(5) RisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven.

(6) YES