YES
Termination Proof
Termination Proof
by ttt2 (version ttt2 1.15)
Input
The rewrite relation of the following TRS is considered.
a(a(b(b(b(b(a(a(x0)))))))) |
→ |
a(a(c(c(a(a(b(b(x0)))))))) |
a(a(c(c(x0)))) |
→ |
c(c(c(c(a(a(x0)))))) |
c(c(c(c(c(c(x0)))))) |
→ |
b(b(c(c(b(b(x0)))))) |
Proof
1 String Reversal
Since only unary symbols occur, one can reverse all terms and obtains the TRS
a(a(b(b(b(b(a(a(x0)))))))) |
→ |
b(b(a(a(c(c(a(a(x0)))))))) |
c(c(a(a(x0)))) |
→ |
a(a(c(c(c(c(x0)))))) |
c(c(c(c(c(c(x0)))))) |
→ |
b(b(c(c(b(b(x0)))))) |
1.1 Dependency Pair Transformation
The following set of initial dependency pairs has been identified.
a#(a(b(b(b(b(a(a(x0)))))))) |
→ |
c#(a(a(x0))) |
a#(a(b(b(b(b(a(a(x0)))))))) |
→ |
c#(c(a(a(x0)))) |
a#(a(b(b(b(b(a(a(x0)))))))) |
→ |
a#(c(c(a(a(x0))))) |
a#(a(b(b(b(b(a(a(x0)))))))) |
→ |
a#(a(c(c(a(a(x0)))))) |
c#(c(a(a(x0)))) |
→ |
c#(x0) |
c#(c(a(a(x0)))) |
→ |
c#(c(x0)) |
c#(c(a(a(x0)))) |
→ |
c#(c(c(x0))) |
c#(c(a(a(x0)))) |
→ |
c#(c(c(c(x0)))) |
c#(c(a(a(x0)))) |
→ |
a#(c(c(c(c(x0))))) |
c#(c(a(a(x0)))) |
→ |
a#(a(c(c(c(c(x0)))))) |
c#(c(c(c(c(c(x0)))))) |
→ |
c#(b(b(x0))) |
c#(c(c(c(c(c(x0)))))) |
→ |
c#(c(b(b(x0)))) |
1.1.1 Dependency Graph Processor
The dependency pairs are split into 1
component.