YES Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /home/cern_httpd/provide/research/cycsrs/tpdb/TPDB-d9b80194f163/SRS_Standard/Secret_06_SRS/secr8.srs

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

b(b(b(x))) → a(x)
a(a(x)) → a(b(a(x)))
b(c(x)) → c(a(a(x)))
a(c(x)) → c(b(b(x)))
a(a(a(x))) → b(a(a(x)))

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

B(b(b(x))) → A(x)
A(a(x)) → A(b(a(x)))
A(a(x)) → B(a(x))
B(c(x)) → A(a(x))
B(c(x)) → A(x)
A(c(x)) → B(b(x))
A(c(x)) → B(x)
A(a(a(x))) → B(a(a(x)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

b(b(b(x))) → a(x)
a(a(x)) → a(b(a(x)))
b(c(x)) → c(a(a(x)))
a(c(x)) → c(b(b(x)))
a(a(a(x))) → b(a(a(x)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) MRRProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the rule removal processor [LPAR04] with the following ordering, at least one Dependency Pair or term rewrite system rule of this QDP problem can be strictly oriented.
Strictly oriented dependency pairs:

B(c(x)) → A(a(x))
B(c(x)) → A(x)
A(c(x)) → B(b(x))
A(c(x)) → B(x)


Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(A(x1)) = x1   
POL(B(x1)) = x1   
POL(a(x1)) = x1   
POL(b(x1)) = x1   
POL(c(x1)) = 2 + x1   

(4) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

B(b(b(x))) → A(x)
A(a(x)) → A(b(a(x)))
A(a(x)) → B(a(x))
A(a(a(x))) → B(a(a(x)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

b(b(b(x))) → a(x)
a(a(x)) → a(b(a(x)))
b(c(x)) → c(a(a(x)))
a(c(x)) → c(b(b(x)))
a(a(a(x))) → b(a(a(x)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


B(b(b(x))) → A(x)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Matrix interpretation [MATRO] with arctic natural numbers [ARCTIC]:

POL(B(x1)) = 1A +
[0A,0A,0A]
·x1

POL(b(x1)) =
/-I\
|-I|
\0A/
+
/0A0A0A\
|1A0A-I|
\0A0A0A/
·x1

POL(A(x1)) = 0A +
[-I,0A,0A]
·x1

POL(a(x1)) =
/0A\
|1A|
\0A/
+
/-I0A-I\
|-I1A0A|
\0A0A0A/
·x1

POL(c(x1)) =
/0A\
|1A|
\-I/
+
/-I-I-I\
|-I-I-I|
\-I-I-I/
·x1

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:

a(a(x)) → a(b(a(x)))
a(a(a(x))) → b(a(a(x)))
b(b(b(x))) → a(x)
a(c(x)) → c(b(b(x)))
b(c(x)) → c(a(a(x)))

(6) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

A(a(x)) → A(b(a(x)))
A(a(x)) → B(a(x))
A(a(a(x))) → B(a(a(x)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

b(b(b(x))) → a(x)
a(a(x)) → a(b(a(x)))
b(c(x)) → c(a(a(x)))
a(c(x)) → c(b(b(x)))
a(a(a(x))) → b(a(a(x)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(7) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 2 less nodes.

(8) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

A(a(x)) → A(b(a(x)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

b(b(b(x))) → a(x)
a(a(x)) → a(b(a(x)))
b(c(x)) → c(a(a(x)))
a(c(x)) → c(b(b(x)))
a(a(a(x))) → b(a(a(x)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(9) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


A(a(x)) → A(b(a(x)))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Matrix interpretation [MATRO] with arctic natural numbers [ARCTIC]:

POL(A(x1)) = -I +
[0A,0A,-I]
·x1

POL(a(x1)) =
/1A\
|-I|
\-I/
+
/1A0A1A\
|0A0A0A|
\0A-I0A/
·x1

POL(b(x1)) =
/0A\
|0A|
\0A/
+
/-I-I0A\
|-I-I0A|
\0A0A1A/
·x1

POL(c(x1)) =
/0A\
|0A|
\0A/
+
/-I-I-I\
|-I-I-I|
\-I-I-I/
·x1

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:

a(a(x)) → a(b(a(x)))
a(a(a(x))) → b(a(a(x)))
b(b(b(x))) → a(x)
a(c(x)) → c(b(b(x)))
b(c(x)) → c(a(a(x)))

(10) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

b(b(b(x))) → a(x)
a(a(x)) → a(b(a(x)))
b(c(x)) → c(a(a(x)))
a(c(x)) → c(b(b(x)))
a(a(a(x))) → b(a(a(x)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(11) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(12) YES