YES Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /home/cern_httpd/provide/research/cycsrs/tpdb/TPDB-d9b80194f163/SRS_Standard/Gebhardt_06/07.srs

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

0(0(0(0(x)))) → 0(1(0(1(x))))
1(0(1(0(x)))) → 0(1(0(0(x))))

Q is empty.

(1) QTRS Reverse (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We applied the QTRS Reverse Processor [REVERSE].

(2) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

0(0(0(0(x)))) → 1(0(1(0(x))))
0(1(0(1(x)))) → 0(0(1(0(x))))

Q is empty.

(3) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(4) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

01(0(0(0(x)))) → 01(1(0(x)))
01(1(0(1(x)))) → 01(0(1(0(x))))
01(1(0(1(x)))) → 01(1(0(x)))
01(1(0(1(x)))) → 01(x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

0(0(0(0(x)))) → 1(0(1(0(x))))
0(1(0(1(x)))) → 0(0(1(0(x))))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


01(0(0(0(x)))) → 01(1(0(x)))
01(1(0(1(x)))) → 01(1(0(x)))
01(1(0(1(x)))) → 01(x)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(0(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL(01(x1)) = x1   
POL(1(x1)) = 1 + x1   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:

0(0(0(0(x)))) → 1(0(1(0(x))))
0(1(0(1(x)))) → 0(0(1(0(x))))

(6) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

01(1(0(1(x)))) → 01(0(1(0(x))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

0(0(0(0(x)))) → 1(0(1(0(x))))
0(1(0(1(x)))) → 0(0(1(0(x))))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(7) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


01(1(0(1(x)))) → 01(0(1(0(x))))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Matrix interpretation [MATRO] with arctic natural numbers [ARCTIC]:

POL(01(x1)) = -I +
[0A,-I,-I]
·x1

POL(1(x1)) =
/0A\
|0A|
\0A/
+
/1A0A0A\
|-I-I0A|
\-I-I-I/
·x1

POL(0(x1)) =
/0A\
|0A|
\0A/
+
/-I0A-I\
|0A1A0A|
\1A0A0A/
·x1

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:

0(0(0(0(x)))) → 1(0(1(0(x))))
0(1(0(1(x)))) → 0(0(1(0(x))))

(8) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

0(0(0(0(x)))) → 1(0(1(0(x))))
0(1(0(1(x)))) → 0(0(1(0(x))))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(9) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(10) YES