YES Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /home/cern_httpd/provide/research/cycsrs/examples/collection/lata10-split.srs

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

Begin(1(x)) → Wait(Right1(x))
Begin(4(x)) → Wait(Right2(x))
Begin(4(x)) → Wait(Right3(x))
Right1(2(End(x))) → Left(4(1(End(x))))
Right2(3(End(x))) → Left(4(2(End(x))))
Right3(2(End(x))) → Left(3(2(End(x))))
Right1(2(x)) → A2(Right1(x))
Right2(2(x)) → A2(Right2(x))
Right3(2(x)) → A2(Right3(x))
Right1(1(x)) → A1(Right1(x))
Right2(1(x)) → A1(Right2(x))
Right3(1(x)) → A1(Right3(x))
Right1(4(x)) → A4(Right1(x))
Right2(4(x)) → A4(Right2(x))
Right3(4(x)) → A4(Right3(x))
Right1(3(x)) → A3(Right1(x))
Right2(3(x)) → A3(Right2(x))
Right3(3(x)) → A3(Right3(x))
A2(Left(x)) → Left(2(x))
A1(Left(x)) → Left(1(x))
A4(Left(x)) → Left(4(x))
A3(Left(x)) → Left(3(x))
Wait(Left(x)) → Begin(x)
2(1(x)) → 4(1(x))
3(4(x)) → 4(2(x))
2(4(x)) → 3(2(x))

Q is empty.

(1) QTRS Reverse (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We applied the QTRS Reverse Processor [REVERSE].

(2) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

1(Begin(x)) → Right1(Wait(x))
4(Begin(x)) → Right2(Wait(x))
4(Begin(x)) → Right3(Wait(x))
End(2(Right1(x))) → End(1(4(Left(x))))
End(3(Right2(x))) → End(2(4(Left(x))))
End(2(Right3(x))) → End(2(3(Left(x))))
2(Right1(x)) → Right1(A2(x))
2(Right2(x)) → Right2(A2(x))
2(Right3(x)) → Right3(A2(x))
1(Right1(x)) → Right1(A1(x))
1(Right2(x)) → Right2(A1(x))
1(Right3(x)) → Right3(A1(x))
4(Right1(x)) → Right1(A4(x))
4(Right2(x)) → Right2(A4(x))
4(Right3(x)) → Right3(A4(x))
3(Right1(x)) → Right1(A3(x))
3(Right2(x)) → Right2(A3(x))
3(Right3(x)) → Right3(A3(x))
Left(A2(x)) → 2(Left(x))
Left(A1(x)) → 1(Left(x))
Left(A4(x)) → 4(Left(x))
Left(A3(x)) → 3(Left(x))
Left(Wait(x)) → Begin(x)
1(2(x)) → 1(4(x))
4(3(x)) → 2(4(x))
4(2(x)) → 2(3(x))

Q is empty.

(3) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(4) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

END(2(Right1(x))) → END(1(4(Left(x))))
END(2(Right1(x))) → 11(4(Left(x)))
END(2(Right1(x))) → 41(Left(x))
END(2(Right1(x))) → LEFT(x)
END(3(Right2(x))) → END(2(4(Left(x))))
END(3(Right2(x))) → 21(4(Left(x)))
END(3(Right2(x))) → 41(Left(x))
END(3(Right2(x))) → LEFT(x)
END(2(Right3(x))) → END(2(3(Left(x))))
END(2(Right3(x))) → 21(3(Left(x)))
END(2(Right3(x))) → 31(Left(x))
END(2(Right3(x))) → LEFT(x)
LEFT(A2(x)) → 21(Left(x))
LEFT(A2(x)) → LEFT(x)
LEFT(A1(x)) → 11(Left(x))
LEFT(A1(x)) → LEFT(x)
LEFT(A4(x)) → 41(Left(x))
LEFT(A4(x)) → LEFT(x)
LEFT(A3(x)) → 31(Left(x))
LEFT(A3(x)) → LEFT(x)
11(2(x)) → 11(4(x))
11(2(x)) → 41(x)
41(3(x)) → 21(4(x))
41(3(x)) → 41(x)
41(2(x)) → 21(3(x))
41(2(x)) → 31(x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

1(Begin(x)) → Right1(Wait(x))
4(Begin(x)) → Right2(Wait(x))
4(Begin(x)) → Right3(Wait(x))
End(2(Right1(x))) → End(1(4(Left(x))))
End(3(Right2(x))) → End(2(4(Left(x))))
End(2(Right3(x))) → End(2(3(Left(x))))
2(Right1(x)) → Right1(A2(x))
2(Right2(x)) → Right2(A2(x))
2(Right3(x)) → Right3(A2(x))
1(Right1(x)) → Right1(A1(x))
1(Right2(x)) → Right2(A1(x))
1(Right3(x)) → Right3(A1(x))
4(Right1(x)) → Right1(A4(x))
4(Right2(x)) → Right2(A4(x))
4(Right3(x)) → Right3(A4(x))
3(Right1(x)) → Right1(A3(x))
3(Right2(x)) → Right2(A3(x))
3(Right3(x)) → Right3(A3(x))
Left(A2(x)) → 2(Left(x))
Left(A1(x)) → 1(Left(x))
Left(A4(x)) → 4(Left(x))
Left(A3(x)) → 3(Left(x))
Left(Wait(x)) → Begin(x)
1(2(x)) → 1(4(x))
4(3(x)) → 2(4(x))
4(2(x)) → 2(3(x))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(5) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 4 SCCs with 17 less nodes.

(6) Complex Obligation (AND)

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

41(3(x)) → 41(x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

1(Begin(x)) → Right1(Wait(x))
4(Begin(x)) → Right2(Wait(x))
4(Begin(x)) → Right3(Wait(x))
End(2(Right1(x))) → End(1(4(Left(x))))
End(3(Right2(x))) → End(2(4(Left(x))))
End(2(Right3(x))) → End(2(3(Left(x))))
2(Right1(x)) → Right1(A2(x))
2(Right2(x)) → Right2(A2(x))
2(Right3(x)) → Right3(A2(x))
1(Right1(x)) → Right1(A1(x))
1(Right2(x)) → Right2(A1(x))
1(Right3(x)) → Right3(A1(x))
4(Right1(x)) → Right1(A4(x))
4(Right2(x)) → Right2(A4(x))
4(Right3(x)) → Right3(A4(x))
3(Right1(x)) → Right1(A3(x))
3(Right2(x)) → Right2(A3(x))
3(Right3(x)) → Right3(A3(x))
Left(A2(x)) → 2(Left(x))
Left(A1(x)) → 1(Left(x))
Left(A4(x)) → 4(Left(x))
Left(A3(x)) → 3(Left(x))
Left(Wait(x)) → Begin(x)
1(2(x)) → 1(4(x))
4(3(x)) → 2(4(x))
4(2(x)) → 2(3(x))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(9) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

41(3(x)) → 41(x)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(10) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • 41(3(x)) → 41(x)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

(11) YES

(12) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

11(2(x)) → 11(4(x))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

1(Begin(x)) → Right1(Wait(x))
4(Begin(x)) → Right2(Wait(x))
4(Begin(x)) → Right3(Wait(x))
End(2(Right1(x))) → End(1(4(Left(x))))
End(3(Right2(x))) → End(2(4(Left(x))))
End(2(Right3(x))) → End(2(3(Left(x))))
2(Right1(x)) → Right1(A2(x))
2(Right2(x)) → Right2(A2(x))
2(Right3(x)) → Right3(A2(x))
1(Right1(x)) → Right1(A1(x))
1(Right2(x)) → Right2(A1(x))
1(Right3(x)) → Right3(A1(x))
4(Right1(x)) → Right1(A4(x))
4(Right2(x)) → Right2(A4(x))
4(Right3(x)) → Right3(A4(x))
3(Right1(x)) → Right1(A3(x))
3(Right2(x)) → Right2(A3(x))
3(Right3(x)) → Right3(A3(x))
Left(A2(x)) → 2(Left(x))
Left(A1(x)) → 1(Left(x))
Left(A4(x)) → 4(Left(x))
Left(A3(x)) → 3(Left(x))
Left(Wait(x)) → Begin(x)
1(2(x)) → 1(4(x))
4(3(x)) → 2(4(x))
4(2(x)) → 2(3(x))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(13) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(14) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

11(2(x)) → 11(4(x))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

4(Begin(x)) → Right2(Wait(x))
4(Begin(x)) → Right3(Wait(x))
4(Right1(x)) → Right1(A4(x))
4(Right2(x)) → Right2(A4(x))
4(Right3(x)) → Right3(A4(x))
4(3(x)) → 2(4(x))
4(2(x)) → 2(3(x))
3(Right1(x)) → Right1(A3(x))
3(Right2(x)) → Right2(A3(x))
3(Right3(x)) → Right3(A3(x))
2(Right1(x)) → Right1(A2(x))
2(Right2(x)) → Right2(A2(x))
2(Right3(x)) → Right3(A2(x))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(15) MRRProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the rule removal processor [LPAR04] with the following ordering, at least one Dependency Pair or term rewrite system rule of this QDP problem can be strictly oriented.

Strictly oriented rules of the TRS R:

4(Begin(x)) → Right2(Wait(x))
4(Begin(x)) → Right3(Wait(x))
4(Right1(x)) → Right1(A4(x))
4(Right3(x)) → Right3(A4(x))
3(Right1(x)) → Right1(A3(x))
3(Right2(x)) → Right2(A3(x))
3(Right3(x)) → Right3(A3(x))
2(Right1(x)) → Right1(A2(x))
2(Right2(x)) → Right2(A2(x))
2(Right3(x)) → Right3(A2(x))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(11(x1)) = x1   
POL(2(x1)) = 2 + 2·x1   
POL(3(x1)) = 2 + 2·x1   
POL(4(x1)) = 2 + 2·x1   
POL(A2(x1)) = x1   
POL(A3(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL(A4(x1)) = 2 + x1   
POL(Begin(x1)) = 2 + 2·x1   
POL(Right1(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL(Right2(x1)) = x1   
POL(Right3(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL(Wait(x1)) = 2·x1   

(16) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

11(2(x)) → 11(4(x))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

4(Right2(x)) → Right2(A4(x))
4(3(x)) → 2(4(x))
4(2(x)) → 2(3(x))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(17) MNOCProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the modular non-overlap check [LPAR04] to enlarge Q to all left-hand sides of R.

(18) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

11(2(x)) → 11(4(x))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

4(Right2(x)) → Right2(A4(x))
4(3(x)) → 2(4(x))
4(2(x)) → 2(3(x))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

4(Right2(x0))
4(3(x0))
4(2(x0))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(19) MRRProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the rule removal processor [LPAR04] with the following ordering, at least one Dependency Pair or term rewrite system rule of this QDP problem can be strictly oriented.
Strictly oriented dependency pairs:

11(2(x)) → 11(4(x))


Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(11(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(2(x1)) = 2 + 2·x1   
POL(3(x1)) = 1 + 2·x1   
POL(4(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(A4(x1)) = x1   
POL(Right2(x1)) = 2·x1   

(20) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

4(Right2(x)) → Right2(A4(x))
4(3(x)) → 2(4(x))
4(2(x)) → 2(3(x))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

4(Right2(x0))
4(3(x0))
4(2(x0))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(21) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(22) YES

(23) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LEFT(A1(x)) → LEFT(x)
LEFT(A2(x)) → LEFT(x)
LEFT(A4(x)) → LEFT(x)
LEFT(A3(x)) → LEFT(x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

1(Begin(x)) → Right1(Wait(x))
4(Begin(x)) → Right2(Wait(x))
4(Begin(x)) → Right3(Wait(x))
End(2(Right1(x))) → End(1(4(Left(x))))
End(3(Right2(x))) → End(2(4(Left(x))))
End(2(Right3(x))) → End(2(3(Left(x))))
2(Right1(x)) → Right1(A2(x))
2(Right2(x)) → Right2(A2(x))
2(Right3(x)) → Right3(A2(x))
1(Right1(x)) → Right1(A1(x))
1(Right2(x)) → Right2(A1(x))
1(Right3(x)) → Right3(A1(x))
4(Right1(x)) → Right1(A4(x))
4(Right2(x)) → Right2(A4(x))
4(Right3(x)) → Right3(A4(x))
3(Right1(x)) → Right1(A3(x))
3(Right2(x)) → Right2(A3(x))
3(Right3(x)) → Right3(A3(x))
Left(A2(x)) → 2(Left(x))
Left(A1(x)) → 1(Left(x))
Left(A4(x)) → 4(Left(x))
Left(A3(x)) → 3(Left(x))
Left(Wait(x)) → Begin(x)
1(2(x)) → 1(4(x))
4(3(x)) → 2(4(x))
4(2(x)) → 2(3(x))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(24) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(25) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LEFT(A1(x)) → LEFT(x)
LEFT(A2(x)) → LEFT(x)
LEFT(A4(x)) → LEFT(x)
LEFT(A3(x)) → LEFT(x)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(26) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • LEFT(A1(x)) → LEFT(x)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

  • LEFT(A2(x)) → LEFT(x)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

  • LEFT(A4(x)) → LEFT(x)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

  • LEFT(A3(x)) → LEFT(x)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

(27) YES

(28) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

END(3(Right2(x))) → END(2(4(Left(x))))
END(2(Right1(x))) → END(1(4(Left(x))))
END(2(Right3(x))) → END(2(3(Left(x))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

1(Begin(x)) → Right1(Wait(x))
4(Begin(x)) → Right2(Wait(x))
4(Begin(x)) → Right3(Wait(x))
End(2(Right1(x))) → End(1(4(Left(x))))
End(3(Right2(x))) → End(2(4(Left(x))))
End(2(Right3(x))) → End(2(3(Left(x))))
2(Right1(x)) → Right1(A2(x))
2(Right2(x)) → Right2(A2(x))
2(Right3(x)) → Right3(A2(x))
1(Right1(x)) → Right1(A1(x))
1(Right2(x)) → Right2(A1(x))
1(Right3(x)) → Right3(A1(x))
4(Right1(x)) → Right1(A4(x))
4(Right2(x)) → Right2(A4(x))
4(Right3(x)) → Right3(A4(x))
3(Right1(x)) → Right1(A3(x))
3(Right2(x)) → Right2(A3(x))
3(Right3(x)) → Right3(A3(x))
Left(A2(x)) → 2(Left(x))
Left(A1(x)) → 1(Left(x))
Left(A4(x)) → 4(Left(x))
Left(A3(x)) → 3(Left(x))
Left(Wait(x)) → Begin(x)
1(2(x)) → 1(4(x))
4(3(x)) → 2(4(x))
4(2(x)) → 2(3(x))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(29) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(30) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

END(3(Right2(x))) → END(2(4(Left(x))))
END(2(Right1(x))) → END(1(4(Left(x))))
END(2(Right3(x))) → END(2(3(Left(x))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

Left(A2(x)) → 2(Left(x))
Left(A1(x)) → 1(Left(x))
Left(A4(x)) → 4(Left(x))
Left(A3(x)) → 3(Left(x))
Left(Wait(x)) → Begin(x)
3(Right1(x)) → Right1(A3(x))
3(Right2(x)) → Right2(A3(x))
3(Right3(x)) → Right3(A3(x))
2(Right1(x)) → Right1(A2(x))
2(Right2(x)) → Right2(A2(x))
2(Right3(x)) → Right3(A2(x))
4(Begin(x)) → Right2(Wait(x))
4(Begin(x)) → Right3(Wait(x))
4(Right1(x)) → Right1(A4(x))
4(Right2(x)) → Right2(A4(x))
4(Right3(x)) → Right3(A4(x))
4(3(x)) → 2(4(x))
4(2(x)) → 2(3(x))
1(Begin(x)) → Right1(Wait(x))
1(Right1(x)) → Right1(A1(x))
1(Right2(x)) → Right2(A1(x))
1(Right3(x)) → Right3(A1(x))
1(2(x)) → 1(4(x))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(31) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


END(3(Right2(x))) → END(2(4(Left(x))))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(1(x1)) = 0   
POL(2(x1)) = 0   
POL(3(x1)) = 1   
POL(4(x1)) = 0   
POL(A1(x1)) = x1   
POL(A2(x1)) = x1   
POL(A3(x1)) = x1   
POL(A4(x1)) = x1   
POL(Begin(x1)) = x1   
POL(END(x1)) = x1   
POL(Left(x1)) = 0   
POL(Right1(x1)) = 0   
POL(Right2(x1)) = 0   
POL(Right3(x1)) = 0   
POL(Wait(x1)) = x1   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:

2(Right1(x)) → Right1(A2(x))
2(Right2(x)) → Right2(A2(x))
2(Right3(x)) → Right3(A2(x))
1(Begin(x)) → Right1(Wait(x))
1(Right1(x)) → Right1(A1(x))
1(Right2(x)) → Right2(A1(x))
1(Right3(x)) → Right3(A1(x))
1(2(x)) → 1(4(x))

(32) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

END(2(Right1(x))) → END(1(4(Left(x))))
END(2(Right3(x))) → END(2(3(Left(x))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

Left(A2(x)) → 2(Left(x))
Left(A1(x)) → 1(Left(x))
Left(A4(x)) → 4(Left(x))
Left(A3(x)) → 3(Left(x))
Left(Wait(x)) → Begin(x)
3(Right1(x)) → Right1(A3(x))
3(Right2(x)) → Right2(A3(x))
3(Right3(x)) → Right3(A3(x))
2(Right1(x)) → Right1(A2(x))
2(Right2(x)) → Right2(A2(x))
2(Right3(x)) → Right3(A2(x))
4(Begin(x)) → Right2(Wait(x))
4(Begin(x)) → Right3(Wait(x))
4(Right1(x)) → Right1(A4(x))
4(Right2(x)) → Right2(A4(x))
4(Right3(x)) → Right3(A4(x))
4(3(x)) → 2(4(x))
4(2(x)) → 2(3(x))
1(Begin(x)) → Right1(Wait(x))
1(Right1(x)) → Right1(A1(x))
1(Right2(x)) → Right2(A1(x))
1(Right3(x)) → Right3(A1(x))
1(2(x)) → 1(4(x))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(33) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


END(2(Right1(x))) → END(1(4(Left(x))))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(1(x1)) = 0   
POL(2(x1)) = 1   
POL(3(x1)) = 0   
POL(4(x1)) = 0   
POL(A1(x1)) = x1   
POL(A2(x1)) = x1   
POL(A3(x1)) = x1   
POL(A4(x1)) = x1   
POL(Begin(x1)) = x1   
POL(END(x1)) = x1   
POL(Left(x1)) = 0   
POL(Right1(x1)) = 0   
POL(Right2(x1)) = 0   
POL(Right3(x1)) = 0   
POL(Wait(x1)) = x1   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:

1(Begin(x)) → Right1(Wait(x))
1(Right1(x)) → Right1(A1(x))
1(Right2(x)) → Right2(A1(x))
1(Right3(x)) → Right3(A1(x))
1(2(x)) → 1(4(x))
2(Right1(x)) → Right1(A2(x))
2(Right2(x)) → Right2(A2(x))
2(Right3(x)) → Right3(A2(x))

(34) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

END(2(Right3(x))) → END(2(3(Left(x))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

Left(A2(x)) → 2(Left(x))
Left(A1(x)) → 1(Left(x))
Left(A4(x)) → 4(Left(x))
Left(A3(x)) → 3(Left(x))
Left(Wait(x)) → Begin(x)
3(Right1(x)) → Right1(A3(x))
3(Right2(x)) → Right2(A3(x))
3(Right3(x)) → Right3(A3(x))
2(Right1(x)) → Right1(A2(x))
2(Right2(x)) → Right2(A2(x))
2(Right3(x)) → Right3(A2(x))
4(Begin(x)) → Right2(Wait(x))
4(Begin(x)) → Right3(Wait(x))
4(Right1(x)) → Right1(A4(x))
4(Right2(x)) → Right2(A4(x))
4(Right3(x)) → Right3(A4(x))
4(3(x)) → 2(4(x))
4(2(x)) → 2(3(x))
1(Begin(x)) → Right1(Wait(x))
1(Right1(x)) → Right1(A1(x))
1(Right2(x)) → Right2(A1(x))
1(Right3(x)) → Right3(A1(x))
1(2(x)) → 1(4(x))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(35) MRRProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the rule removal processor [LPAR04] with the following ordering, at least one Dependency Pair or term rewrite system rule of this QDP problem can be strictly oriented.

Strictly oriented rules of the TRS R:

1(Right1(x)) → Right1(A1(x))
1(Right2(x)) → Right2(A1(x))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(1(x1)) = 2 + x1   
POL(2(x1)) = x1   
POL(3(x1)) = x1   
POL(4(x1)) = x1   
POL(A1(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL(A2(x1)) = x1   
POL(A3(x1)) = x1   
POL(A4(x1)) = x1   
POL(Begin(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(END(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(Left(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(Right1(x1)) = 2 + x1   
POL(Right2(x1)) = x1   
POL(Right3(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(Wait(x1)) = x1   

(36) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

END(2(Right3(x))) → END(2(3(Left(x))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

Left(A2(x)) → 2(Left(x))
Left(A1(x)) → 1(Left(x))
Left(A4(x)) → 4(Left(x))
Left(A3(x)) → 3(Left(x))
Left(Wait(x)) → Begin(x)
3(Right1(x)) → Right1(A3(x))
3(Right2(x)) → Right2(A3(x))
3(Right3(x)) → Right3(A3(x))
2(Right1(x)) → Right1(A2(x))
2(Right2(x)) → Right2(A2(x))
2(Right3(x)) → Right3(A2(x))
4(Begin(x)) → Right2(Wait(x))
4(Begin(x)) → Right3(Wait(x))
4(Right1(x)) → Right1(A4(x))
4(Right2(x)) → Right2(A4(x))
4(Right3(x)) → Right3(A4(x))
4(3(x)) → 2(4(x))
4(2(x)) → 2(3(x))
1(Begin(x)) → Right1(Wait(x))
1(Right3(x)) → Right3(A1(x))
1(2(x)) → 1(4(x))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(37) MRRProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the rule removal processor [LPAR04] with the following ordering, at least one Dependency Pair or term rewrite system rule of this QDP problem can be strictly oriented.

Strictly oriented rules of the TRS R:

1(Begin(x)) → Right1(Wait(x))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(1(x1)) = 3·x1   
POL(2(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(3(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(4(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(A1(x1)) = 3·x1   
POL(A2(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(A3(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(A4(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(Begin(x1)) = 2 + x1   
POL(END(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(Left(x1)) = x1   
POL(Right1(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(Right2(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(Right3(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(Wait(x1)) = 2 + x1   

(38) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

END(2(Right3(x))) → END(2(3(Left(x))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

Left(A2(x)) → 2(Left(x))
Left(A1(x)) → 1(Left(x))
Left(A4(x)) → 4(Left(x))
Left(A3(x)) → 3(Left(x))
Left(Wait(x)) → Begin(x)
3(Right1(x)) → Right1(A3(x))
3(Right2(x)) → Right2(A3(x))
3(Right3(x)) → Right3(A3(x))
2(Right1(x)) → Right1(A2(x))
2(Right2(x)) → Right2(A2(x))
2(Right3(x)) → Right3(A2(x))
4(Begin(x)) → Right2(Wait(x))
4(Begin(x)) → Right3(Wait(x))
4(Right1(x)) → Right1(A4(x))
4(Right2(x)) → Right2(A4(x))
4(Right3(x)) → Right3(A4(x))
4(3(x)) → 2(4(x))
4(2(x)) → 2(3(x))
1(Right3(x)) → Right3(A1(x))
1(2(x)) → 1(4(x))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(39) MRRProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the rule removal processor [LPAR04] with the following ordering, at least one Dependency Pair or term rewrite system rule of this QDP problem can be strictly oriented.

Strictly oriented rules of the TRS R:

4(Begin(x)) → Right2(Wait(x))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(1(x1)) = x1   
POL(2(x1)) = x1   
POL(3(x1)) = x1   
POL(4(x1)) = x1   
POL(A1(x1)) = x1   
POL(A2(x1)) = x1   
POL(A3(x1)) = x1   
POL(A4(x1)) = x1   
POL(Begin(x1)) = 2 + 2·x1   
POL(END(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(Left(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(Right1(x1)) = x1   
POL(Right2(x1)) = x1   
POL(Right3(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(Wait(x1)) = 1 + x1   

(40) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

END(2(Right3(x))) → END(2(3(Left(x))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

Left(A2(x)) → 2(Left(x))
Left(A1(x)) → 1(Left(x))
Left(A4(x)) → 4(Left(x))
Left(A3(x)) → 3(Left(x))
Left(Wait(x)) → Begin(x)
3(Right1(x)) → Right1(A3(x))
3(Right2(x)) → Right2(A3(x))
3(Right3(x)) → Right3(A3(x))
2(Right1(x)) → Right1(A2(x))
2(Right2(x)) → Right2(A2(x))
2(Right3(x)) → Right3(A2(x))
4(Begin(x)) → Right3(Wait(x))
4(Right1(x)) → Right1(A4(x))
4(Right2(x)) → Right2(A4(x))
4(Right3(x)) → Right3(A4(x))
4(3(x)) → 2(4(x))
4(2(x)) → 2(3(x))
1(Right3(x)) → Right3(A1(x))
1(2(x)) → 1(4(x))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(41) MRRProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the rule removal processor [LPAR04] with the following ordering, at least one Dependency Pair or term rewrite system rule of this QDP problem can be strictly oriented.

Strictly oriented rules of the TRS R:

3(Right1(x)) → Right1(A3(x))
3(Right2(x)) → Right2(A3(x))
2(Right1(x)) → Right1(A2(x))
2(Right2(x)) → Right2(A2(x))
4(Right1(x)) → Right1(A4(x))
4(Right2(x)) → Right2(A4(x))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(1(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(2(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(3(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(4(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(A1(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(A2(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(A3(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(A4(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(Begin(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(END(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(Left(x1)) = x1   
POL(Right1(x1)) = 3 + 2·x1   
POL(Right2(x1)) = 2 + 2·x1   
POL(Right3(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(Wait(x1)) = 2·x1   

(42) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

END(2(Right3(x))) → END(2(3(Left(x))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

Left(A2(x)) → 2(Left(x))
Left(A1(x)) → 1(Left(x))
Left(A4(x)) → 4(Left(x))
Left(A3(x)) → 3(Left(x))
Left(Wait(x)) → Begin(x)
3(Right3(x)) → Right3(A3(x))
2(Right3(x)) → Right3(A2(x))
4(Begin(x)) → Right3(Wait(x))
4(Right3(x)) → Right3(A4(x))
4(3(x)) → 2(4(x))
4(2(x)) → 2(3(x))
1(Right3(x)) → Right3(A1(x))
1(2(x)) → 1(4(x))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(43) MRRProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the rule removal processor [LPAR04] with the following ordering, at least one Dependency Pair or term rewrite system rule of this QDP problem can be strictly oriented.

Strictly oriented rules of the TRS R:

1(Right3(x)) → Right3(A1(x))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(1(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(2(x1)) = 1 + 2·x1   
POL(3(x1)) = 1 + 2·x1   
POL(4(x1)) = 1 + 2·x1   
POL(A1(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(A2(x1)) = 1 + 2·x1   
POL(A3(x1)) = 1 + 2·x1   
POL(A4(x1)) = 1 + 2·x1   
POL(Begin(x1)) = x1   
POL(END(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(Left(x1)) = x1   
POL(Right3(x1)) = 1 + 2·x1   
POL(Wait(x1)) = x1   

(44) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

END(2(Right3(x))) → END(2(3(Left(x))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

Left(A2(x)) → 2(Left(x))
Left(A1(x)) → 1(Left(x))
Left(A4(x)) → 4(Left(x))
Left(A3(x)) → 3(Left(x))
Left(Wait(x)) → Begin(x)
3(Right3(x)) → Right3(A3(x))
2(Right3(x)) → Right3(A2(x))
4(Begin(x)) → Right3(Wait(x))
4(Right3(x)) → Right3(A4(x))
4(3(x)) → 2(4(x))
4(2(x)) → 2(3(x))
1(2(x)) → 1(4(x))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(45) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


END(2(Right3(x))) → END(2(3(Left(x))))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial Order [NEGPOLO,POLO] with Interpretation:
POL( 2(x1) ) = x1

POL( 3(x1) ) = x1

POL( END(x1) ) = max{0, 2x1 - 2}

POL( Left(x1) ) = 2x1

POL( A2(x1) ) = x1

POL( A1(x1) ) = x1 + 2

POL( 1(x1) ) = max{0, -2}

POL( A4(x1) ) = 2x1

POL( 4(x1) ) = 2x1

POL( A3(x1) ) = x1

POL( Wait(x1) ) = 1

POL( Begin(x1) ) = 2

POL( Right3(x1) ) = 2x1 + 2


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:

Left(A2(x)) → 2(Left(x))
Left(A1(x)) → 1(Left(x))
Left(A4(x)) → 4(Left(x))
Left(A3(x)) → 3(Left(x))
Left(Wait(x)) → Begin(x)
3(Right3(x)) → Right3(A3(x))
2(Right3(x)) → Right3(A2(x))
1(2(x)) → 1(4(x))
4(Begin(x)) → Right3(Wait(x))
4(Right3(x)) → Right3(A4(x))
4(3(x)) → 2(4(x))
4(2(x)) → 2(3(x))

(46) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

Left(A2(x)) → 2(Left(x))
Left(A1(x)) → 1(Left(x))
Left(A4(x)) → 4(Left(x))
Left(A3(x)) → 3(Left(x))
Left(Wait(x)) → Begin(x)
3(Right3(x)) → Right3(A3(x))
2(Right3(x)) → Right3(A2(x))
4(Begin(x)) → Right3(Wait(x))
4(Right3(x)) → Right3(A4(x))
4(3(x)) → 2(4(x))
4(2(x)) → 2(3(x))
1(2(x)) → 1(4(x))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(47) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(48) YES