YES Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /home/cern_httpd/provide/research/cycsrs/examples/collection/bincount4.srs

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

0(P(x)) → 1(P(x))
1(P(x)) → c(P(x))
0(c(x)) → 1(0(x))
1(c(x)) → c(0(x))

Q is empty.

(1) Overlay + Local Confluence (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS is overlay and locally confluent. By [NOC] we can switch to innermost.

(2) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

0(P(x)) → 1(P(x))
1(P(x)) → c(P(x))
0(c(x)) → 1(0(x))
1(c(x)) → c(0(x))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

0(P(x0))
1(P(x0))
0(c(x0))
1(c(x0))

(3) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(4) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

01(P(x)) → 11(P(x))
01(c(x)) → 11(0(x))
01(c(x)) → 01(x)
11(c(x)) → 01(x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

0(P(x)) → 1(P(x))
1(P(x)) → c(P(x))
0(c(x)) → 1(0(x))
1(c(x)) → c(0(x))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

0(P(x0))
1(P(x0))
0(c(x0))
1(c(x0))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(5) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.

(6) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

01(c(x)) → 11(0(x))
11(c(x)) → 01(x)
01(c(x)) → 01(x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

0(P(x)) → 1(P(x))
1(P(x)) → c(P(x))
0(c(x)) → 1(0(x))
1(c(x)) → c(0(x))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

0(P(x0))
1(P(x0))
0(c(x0))
1(c(x0))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(7) MRRProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the rule removal processor [LPAR04] with the following ordering, at least one Dependency Pair or term rewrite system rule of this QDP problem can be strictly oriented.
Strictly oriented dependency pairs:

01(c(x)) → 11(0(x))
11(c(x)) → 01(x)
01(c(x)) → 01(x)


Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(0(x1)) = 2 + 2·x1   
POL(01(x1)) = 3 + 3·x1   
POL(1(x1)) = 2 + 2·x1   
POL(11(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(P(x1)) = x1   
POL(c(x1)) = 2 + 2·x1   

(8) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

0(P(x)) → 1(P(x))
1(P(x)) → c(P(x))
0(c(x)) → 1(0(x))
1(c(x)) → c(0(x))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

0(P(x0))
1(P(x0))
0(c(x0))
1(c(x0))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(9) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(10) YES